Studies was in fact analysed using SPSS twenty-five.0. Very first descriptive analyses was in fact did, and Cronbach’s alphas and you may wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were used to evaluate associations between gender, age, intimate direction, with a romantic/sexual spouse, SNS put, sexting normalisation and you may willingness to take part in sexting since independent details, together with four sexting habits because the mainly based variables. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 was thought to be a way of measuring effect dimensions. All parameters was basically joined toward model in addition. The study has also been stratified of the intercourse.
Frequency regarding sexting behaviors
The most common sexting behaviors are getting (21.2%) and getting through a mediator (28.4%), with third-party forwarding off intimate stuff (nine.3%) and you can, finally, giving (8.1%). Descriptive statistics are shown from inside the Dining table dos.
The regression activities have been extreme. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos are .42 on the “sending” design, .30 towards the “receiving” design, .23 on the “third-people forwarding” design, and .17 into “researching thru a mediator” model (Desk 3:
In the “sending” design, willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% trust period [CI]: 5.36-), with a romantic/intimate spouse (OR: step three.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), playing with Snapchat (OR: step 1.87; 95% CI: 1.19-2.93), sexual positioning (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: 1.04-3.00) and ages (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.14-step 1.63) were notably about sending wedding. In the “receiving” model, which have a romantic/intimate spouse (OR: step three.27; 95% CI: dos.51-4.28), willingness in order to sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: dos.01-3.89), using Instagram (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.16-step three.10), gender (OR: step 1.82; 95% CI: step one.37-dos.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step 1.6step 1; 95% CI: 1.dos1-2.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.49; 95% CI: step one.20-1.86) and you can decades (OR: step 1.26; 95% CI: step 1.12-1.41) was somewhat linked to receiving wedding.
About “third-class forwarding” model, playing with Instagram (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: step 1.16-6.51), determination to sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.48-2.72), intercourse (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.3dos-2.91), which have an enchanting/sexual spouse (OR: step 1.86; 95% CI: step one.dos9-dos.68), using Facebook (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: step one.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: step one.09-1.87) and you can decades (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: step 1.22-1.66) was indeed notably associated with involvement for the third-class forwarding.
Regarding “finding thru a mediator” model, having fun with Instagram (OR: dos.16; 95% CI: step one.47-step three.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.84; 95% CI: step one.52-2.24), with a romantic/sexual spouse (OR: 1.7step 1; 95% CI: step 1.35-2.17), intercourse (OR: step one.4step 1; 95% CI: step 1.1step one-step 1.80) and you will ages (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: 1.23-step one.49) was in fact notably associated with engagement for the searching via a mediator.
Sex variations
Brand new regression designs had been significant. Nagelkerke’s R 2 was .fifty for females and you Atlanta, TX teen girl sexy can .41 to own people to your “sending” model; .29 for women and you may .31 having guys on the “receiving” model; .18 for women and .twenty-four to own boys towards the “third-class forwarding” model; and you will .fourteen for girls and you will .twenty-two having men to your “researching via an intermediary” model (Dining table cuatro:
From the “sending” model, for women, determination so you can sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), which have an intimate/sexual mate (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: dos.27-9.09) and ages (OR: step 1.60; 95% CI: step one.17-2.20) was rather pertaining to delivering involvement. To possess boys, they were determination so you can sext (OR: 6.05; 95% CI: step 3.68-nine.94), which have an intimate/intimate mate (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.59-4.88) and utilizing Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: step one.32-cuatro.29).
About “receiving” design, for women, determination so you can sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), having fun with Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: step 1.43-), with a romantic/intimate lover (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: 2.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.62; 95% CI: 1.13-2.33) and you can years (OR: step one.42; 95% CI: step 1.step 17-1.72) was indeed rather associated with finding engagement. To own boys, these people were with an intimate/intimate mate (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: dos.08-4.25), desire in order to sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.58-3.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.38-2.91), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: step 1.06-step 1.86) and you can ages (OR: step one.20; 95% CI: 1.04-step one.38).